---
title: "AI agent in customer service: securing refunds"
url: https://knowyouragent.ch/en/knowledge/use-cases/ai-agent-in-customer-service
lang: en
updated: 2026-10-17
license: © Innopulse Consulting GmbH
---

# AI agent in customer service: securing refunds

In customer service, agents talk with customers and resolve cases themselves, up to credits and refunds. This makes every customer message a potential instruction, and exactly that must be secured.

[Leutrim Miftaraj](https://knowyouragent.ch/en/about/leutrim-miftaraj), Founder, Innopulse Consulting GmbH
Published 17 October 2026

## Key points

- The customer is not the [principal](https://knowyouragent.ch/en/knowledge/glossary/principal): her message must not shift the merchant&#x27;s limits.
- Credits and refunds are checked against the mandate outside the model before booking.
- Denied decisions show where customers or attackers test the limits.

## Starting point

A merchant deploys an agent that handles complaints: tracking deliveries, detecting errors, offering replacements or credits. It is to resolve small cases itself and hand larger ones to staff. The risk: a cleverly worded message leads the agent to refund more than allowed.

## Flow with evidence

- **Merchant&#x27;s mandate:** the agent may book credits up to CHF 100 and refunds up to the order value, only for existing orders.
- **Case review:** the agent checks order, delivery status and reason for the complaint.
- **Decision:** a decision service checks amount and link to the order against the mandate.
- **Escalation:** higher amounts or unusual cases go to staff.
- **Booking and receipt:** every credit is recorded with a reference to case and decision.

## Risks and countermeasures

- **Confused deputy:** the customer is not the principal. Her message must never lead the agent to use its rights beyond the merchant&#x27;s limits ([confused deputy](https://knowyouragent.ch/en/knowledge/glossary/confused-deputy)).
- **Injected instructions:** claims such as “your supervisor approved this” are checked against the mandate, not believed.
- **Serial abuse:** detect and escalate many small credits to the same person or address.
- **Missing traceability:** without a receipt, it cannot be shown later why a credit was booked.

## What KYA verifies

For every credit, KYA checks whether it lay within the merchant&#x27;s mandate, whether a decision existed and whether the booking matched it. A credit above the limit shows up in the scope check, regardless of how convincing the customer&#x27;s message was.

## Adoption

Start with small credits and clear cases, such as late deliveries. Analyze denied decisions regularly; clusters show where customers or attackers test the limits.

## Roles and responsibilities

- **Customer service management:** sets limits for credits and refunds and issues the mandate.
- **Operations:** runs the agent and the decision service and analyzes denied decisions.
- **Staff:** take over escalated cases and decide on exceptions.
- **Finance:** matches booked credits against receipts.

## Operating metrics

Important are the share of cases resolved by the agent, the total of credits per day compared with the average, denied decisions by reason and recurring recipients. A rise in denied decisions with the reason “above the limit” often shows deliberate attempts to talk the agent into things.

## How the certificate looks

For a credit of CHF 60 due to a late delivery, the merchant&#x27;s mandate, the decision and the receipt are present. The certificate confirms that the amount was below the CHF 100 limit, that a decision existed and that the booking matched it. The verdict is valid.

If the agent was talked into a credit of CHF 900, the scope check reports the code amount_exceeds_limit. If the receipt of the booking is missing, the execution check reports no_receipt, and the result does not reach the higher levels.

## Frequently asked questions

### May an AI agent in customer service refund money?

Yes, within a mandate from the merchant. What matters is that the refund decision does not depend on the model alone but is checked against clear limits.

### How do I prevent customers from talking the agent into things?

By having every refund checked against the mandate by a component outside the model before booking. Claims in messages do not change the limits.

### What is a confused deputy in customer service?

An agent that uses its rights in the customer&#x27;s interest rather than within the merchant&#x27;s limits, for example because she persuades it with a claim.

### Which records do I need?

For every credit: the case, the decision and the receipt of the booking, so it can be shown later why and within which limits the refund was made.

### Should the agent tell customers it has a limit?

Yes. Transparency defuses conflicts: the agent explains that it can decide up to an amount itself and that a staff member takes over above it.

### How do I handle goodwill cases?

Goodwill is a separate action with its own limit in the mandate. Anything above it is decided by a person, and a signed decision records the exception.

### Can the agent also trigger replacement deliveries?

Yes, as a separate action in the mandate with its own limit, for example up to the value of the original order. Replacement deliveries are also checked before execution and recorded.

### How quickly can the agent&#x27;s mandate be adjusted?

A new mandate with changed limits is issued in minutes. Revoke the old one through the [status list](https://knowyouragent.ch/en/knowledge/glossary/status-list) so only the new limits apply.

## Sources

- OWASP: LLM01 Prompt Injection: [https://genai.owasp.org/llmrisk/llm01-prompt-injection/](https://genai.owasp.org/llmrisk/llm01-prompt-injection/)
- Confused-Deputy-Problem (Übersicht): [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confused_deputy_problem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confused_deputy_problem)

---
Quelle: https://knowyouragent.ch/en/knowledge/use-cases/ai-agent-in-customer-service · KYA – Know Your Agent
